Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Barleria
prionitis Leaf
Extracts against Bacteria
Swati Paul*, Dibyajyoti
Saha
Department
of Pharmacy, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Chittagong
*Corresponding Author E-mail: saha.dibyajyoti@gmail.com ; swati946@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Bacterial infections are one of the prominent causes of
health problems, physical disabilities and mortalities around the world.
Symptoms and complications associated with bacterial infections such as fever,
chills, headache, nausea, vomiting and organ failures affect patient’s life
severely. Medicinal plants are a rich source of antimicrobial agents and
provide a safer and cost effective way of treating bacterial infections. We
report in this work for the first time, the potent antibacterial activity of
different leaf extracts of Barleria prionotis L. The objectives of this study were to
examine the antibacterial effect using different extract [petroleum ether (40o-60o),
chloroform, ethanol (70%)] and column fraction of Barleria
prionitis Linn (Acanthaceae)
leaf and to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the
different Barleria prionitis
Linn (Acanthaceae) leaf extract and column
fraction. S. typhi (Ty 2-59) [Chloroform
extract, Column fraction]; V. cholerae (DN-6)
[Column fraction]; V. cholerae (793)
[Chloroform extract]; V. cholerae (813)
[Chloroform extract, Column fraction]; M. luteus
(ATCC-9341) [Chloroform extract, Column fraction]; L. sporogenus
[Chloroform extract] and Citrobacter
[Chloroform extract, Column fraction] were inhibited at 5mg/ml level. B. subtils (PI-6633) [Pet. ether extract] inhibited at
3.33mg/ml level. B. cereus (PI-11778) [Column fraction] and Providencia [Chloroform extract, Column
fraction] were inhibited at 50mg/ml
level.
KEYWORDS: Barleria prionitis; Antibacterial activity; Minimum Inhibitory
Concentration (MIC)
INTRODUCTION:
Barleria prionitis
Linn (Acanthaceae) is widely distributed throughout
Africa, India, Sri Lanka and tropical Asia. The crude extract of this plant is
commonly used in folk medicine to treat whooping cough. The plant extract has
also shown its potential applications as diaphoretic and expectorant. The plant
has also shown anti-respiratory syncytial virus, anti-arthritic,
anti-inflammatory and anti-fertility activities. Barleria
prionitis L. is an erect bushy shrub of family Acanthacae. The height is about 1.5 metres.
The leaves are narrowly to broadly elliptic lanceolate,
entire, and appraised hairy beneath. The flowers are yellow, in axillary, spikate clusters. The
flowering season is September to March.
In Ayurveda the leaves and the
tender branches are used for treatment of toothache, strengthening of gums,
whooping cough and premature ejeculation. Whole-plant
extracts of porcupine flower contain iridoid
glycosides, barlerin,and verbascoside,
which have shown potent activity against respiratory syncytial
virus in vitro and may account for the plant’s use in treating fever and
several respiratory diseases in herbal medicine1.
Plants and plant products have been used extensively
throughout history to treat medical problems. Extracts of many plants are
highly efficient against parasitic as well as microbial infection. It is
estimated that around 70,000 plant species, from lichens to tall trees, have
been used at one time to other for medicinal purposes2-7. The
medicinal plants are the plants whose parts (leaves, seeds, stem, roots,
fruits, foliages etc.), extracts, infusions, decoction, powders are used in the
treatment of different diseases of humans, plants and animals8. The
medicinal plants occupy a significant place in modern medicine as a raw
material for some important drugs, although synthetic drugs and antibiotics
brought about a revolution in controlling different diseases. But these
synthetic drugs are out of reach to million of
people. Those who live in remote places depend on traditional healers, whom
they know and trust. The judicious use of medicinal herbs can even cure deadly
diseases that have long defied synthetic drugs9. Emergence of drug resistance bacteria also reduces the
antimicrobial efficacy of many potential antimicrobial drugs. So, there is a
increase need for new antimicrobial agents to combat this problem. Bacteria are
the prokaryotes. The smallest free-living microorganism is the unicellular. The
chromosome of the bacteria is located in the cytoplasm, usually attached to the
cell membrane. In bacteria mitosis and meiosis nuclear divisions are absent.
Nucleolus is absent in bacteria. Normally asexual reproduction is happened in
bacteria. There is one chromosome is present in bacteria. In bacteria cell wall
usually contains peptidoglycan; ribosomes
are smaller, usually 70s; flagella structurally simple and pili
are present10.
Materials and Methods:
The plant has been collected from the forest of Ichharia village, Bankura, West
Bengal, India and has been authenticated by B.S.I., Shibpur,
Howrah, West Bengal, India.
Preparation of Extract:
The leaves were carefully washed under running tap water
followed by sterile distilled water. These were air dried at room temperature
(450C) for five days and pulverized to a fine powder using a
sterilized mixer grinder and stored in air-tight bottles. Then the leaf powder
extracted with petroleum ether (400-600), chloroform and
maceration is done with 70% ethanol. The column fraction (70% ethanol extract)
is get by column chromatography. After filtration of total extracts, the
extracts were evaporated to dryness in vacuum.
Preparation of Media:
(A) Solid Media
Bacteriological Peptone (Oxoid)
--1% w/v
Beef Extract (Oxoid) ----------------2%
w/v
Sodium Chloride (Analar)
----------0.5% w/v
Agar (Oxoid) -------------------------1.5%
w/v
Distilled Water ---------------------- Q.S. to 100ml
PH--------------------------------------7.2 - 7.4
(B) Liquid media:
Bacteriological Peptone (Oxoid)
-----1% w/v
Beef extract (Oxoid)
------------------ 0.5% w/v
Sodium Chloride (Analar)
------------0.5% w/v
Distilled Water -------------------------Q.S. to 100ml
PH----------------------------------------7.2 - 7.4
(C) Peptone water:
Bacteriological peptone (Oxoid)
------1% w/v
Sodium Chloride (Analar)
-------------0.5% w/v
Distilled Water -------------------------Q.S. to 100ml
PH----------------------------------------7.2 - 7.4
Bacterial strains :
The sources of bacterial strains, used for investigation
of the antimicrobial properties of all the extracts are enlisted in table 1.
Determination of Minimum
Inhibitory Concentration:
Gram (+ve) and gram (–ve) bacteria were grown in peptone water for 18 h; this
gave an optimum growth of the test bacteria. The petroleum ether (400-600C)
extract, chloroform extract, 70% ethanol extract and column fraction separately
dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) sterilized by filtration by using sintered glass filter (G-5) and stored
at 40C.
Petroleum ether extract was added to molten nutrient agar
in the following concentration (mg/ml): 3.33; 6.66; 16.66; 33.33. Chloroform
extract and column fraction was then added to molten nutrient agar in the
following concentration (mg/ml): 5; 10; 25; 50. Ethanol (70%) extract added to
9 ml molten nutrient agar in the following concentration (mg/ml): 10; 20; 50;
100 and poured into sterile petridish. The pH of the
media was maintained at 7.2-7.4. The inoculums consisted of an over night grown broth culture of a bacterium diluted in
such a manner that a 2mm (internal diameter) loopful
of that culture contain 105 colony forming unit (CFU). These were
then spot inoculated at the sterilized laminar air flow on nutrient agar plates
containing increasing amount of a compound, inoculated at 370C up to
72h for determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)11.
Table-1: Name, type and sources of bacterial strains
used for determination of antimicrobial activity
NAME OF STRAINS |
TYPE |
SOURCE |
Salmonella typhi (Ty 2-59) |
Gram (–ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University; Kolkata-700032 |
Bacilus cereus (PI – 11778) |
Gram (+ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University; Kolkata-700032 |
Bacilus subtilis (PI – 6633) |
Gram (+ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University; Kolkata-700032 |
Vibrio cholerae (DN – 6) |
Gram (–ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University; Kolkata-700032 |
Vibrio cholerae ( 793 ) |
Gram (–ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University; Kolkata-700032 |
Vibrio cholerae ( 813 ) |
Gram (–ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University;Kolkata-700032 |
Micrococus luteus ( ATCC – 9341 ) |
Gram (+ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Jadavpur
University; Kolkata-700032 |
Providencia |
Gram (–ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University; Kolkata-700032 |
Lactobacillus sporogenus |
Gram (–ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University; Kolkata-700032 |
Citrobacter ( 8307) |
Gram (–ve) |
Dept. of Pharm. Technology; Division of Microbiology; Jadavpur University; Kolkata-700032 |
Results and Discussion :
Table-2: Effect of Barleria
prionitis leaf extract (Petroleum ether) on
different group of bacteria
Name of Strains |
Concentration(mg/ml) |
|||
3.33 |
6.66 |
16.66 |
33.33 |
|
Salmonella typhi (Ty 2-59) |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Bacilus cereus (PI – 11778) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Bacilus subtilis (PI – 6633) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae (DN – 6) |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae ( 793 ) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Vibrio cholerae ( 813 ) |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Micrococus luteus ATCC– 9341 |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Providencia |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Lactobacillus sporogenus |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Citrobacter ( 8307 ) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ = Presence of growth - = Absence of growth
Discussion:
Result given in table 2 indicates that B.subtilis (PI-6633) was found to be highly
sensitive to the drug as it was inhibited at 3.33mg/ml level. S.typhi (Ty 2-59), V.cholerae
(DN-6), V.cholerae (813) and M.luteus (ATCC-9341) were inhibited at 6.66mg/ml level.
A MIC of 33.33mg/ml was observed against Citrobacter
(8307). The remaining B.cereus (PI-11778), V.cholerae (793), Providencia
and L. sporogenus were resistant to the
drug.
Table- 3: Effect
of Barleria prionitis
leaf extract
(chloroform) on different group of bacteria
Name of Strains |
Concentration (mg/ml) |
|||
5 |
10 |
25 |
50 |
|
Salmonella typhi (Ty 2-59) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Bacilus cereus (PI – 11778) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Bacilus subtilis (PI – 6633) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae (DN – 6) |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae ( 793 ) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae ( 813 ) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Micrococus luteus ATCC– 9341 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Providencia |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Lactobacillus sporogenus |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Citrobacter ( 8307 ) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ = Presence of growth
- = Absence of growth
Discussion:
Result given in table 3 indicates that S.typhi (Ty 2-59), B.subtilis
(PI-6633), V.cholerae (793), V.cholerae (813), M.luteus(ATCC-9341),
L.sporogenus and citrobacter
(8307) were found to be highly sensitive to the drug as they were inhibited at
5mg/ml level. V.cholerae (DN-6) was inhibited
at 25mg/ml level. A MIC of 50mg/ml was observed against Providencia.
The remaining B.cereus (PI-11778) was
resistant to the drug.
Table- 4: Effect of Barleria
prionitis leaf extract (70% ethanol) on different
group of bacteria:
Name of Strains |
Concentration (mg/ml) |
|||
10 |
20 |
50 |
100 |
|
Salmonella typhi (Ty 2-59) |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Bacilus cereus (PI – 11778) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Bacilus subtilis (PI – 6633) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae (DN – 6) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Vibrio cholerae ( 793 ) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae ( 813 ) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Micrococus luteus ATCC– 9341 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Providencia |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Lactobacillus sporogenus |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Citrobacter ( 8307 ) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+= Presence of growth
- = Absence of growth
Discussion:
Result given in table 4 indicates that Bacillus subtilis (PI-6633), Vibrio
cholerae
(793), Vibrio
cholerae (813) and Micrococcus luteus (ATCC-9341) were found to be highly sensitive to
the drug as they were inhibited at 10mg/ml level. Sulmonella
typhi (Ty 2-59) and Lactobacillus sporogenus were inhibited at 20mg/ml level. An MIC of
100mg/ml was observed against Vibrio cholerae (DN-6). The remaining strains were resistant
to the drug.
Table- 5: Effect of Barleria
prionitis leaf extract (column fraction) on different group
of bacteria:
Name of Strains |
Concentration (mg/ml) |
|||
5 |
10 |
25 |
50 |
|
Salmonella typhi(Ty 2-59) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Bacilus cereus (PI – 11778) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Bacilus subtilis (PI – 6633) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae (DN – 6) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vibrio cholerae ( 793 ) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Vibrio cholerae ( 813 ) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Micrococus luteus ATCC– 9341 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Providencia |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Lactobacillus sporogenus |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Citrobacter ( 8307 ) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ = Presence of growth - = Absence of growth
Discussion:
Result given in table 5 indicates that S. typhi (Ty 2-59), B. subtilis
(PI-6633), V.cholerae (DN-6), V. cholerae (813), M. luteus
(ATCC-9341) and Ctrobacter (8307) were found
to be highly sensitive to the drug as they were inhibited at 5mg/ml level. A
MIC of 50mg/ml was observed against B. cereus (PI-11778),V.cholerae (793), providencia
and L. sporogenus.
Comparative study of mic:
Table- 6: Comparative study of
MIC among the all extract on different group of bacteria
Name of Strains |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (mg/ml) |
|||
Pet. Ether extract |
Chloroform extract |
Ethanol extract |
Column fraction |
|
Salmonella typhi (Ty 2-59) |
6.66mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
20mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
Bacilus cereus (PI – 11778) |
N.A. |
N.A. |
N.A. |
50mg/ml |
Bacilus subtilis (PI – 6633) |
3.33mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
10mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
Vibrio cholerae (DN – 6) |
6.66mg/ml |
25mg/ml |
100mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
Vibrio cholerae ( 793 ) |
N.A |
5mg/ml |
10mg/ml |
50mg/ml |
Vibrio cholerae ( 813 ) |
6.66mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
10mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
M. luteus ATCC – 9341 |
6.66mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
10mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
Providencia |
N.A. |
50mg/ml |
N.A. |
50mg/ml |
Lactobacillus sporogenus |
N.A. |
5mg/ml |
20mg/ml |
50mg/ml |
Citrobacter ( 8307 ) |
33.33mg/ml |
5mg/ml |
N.A. |
5mg/ml |
N.A. = Not Active
Figure-1:Graphical Representation of MIC among the all extract on
different group of bacteria
Conclusion
From the above graph it can be concluded that the S. typhi (Ty 2-59) [Chloroform extract, Column
fraction]; V. cholerae
(DN-6) [Column
fraction]; V. cholerae (793) [Chloroform extract]; V. cholerae (813) [Chloroform extract, Column
fraction]; M. luteus (ATCC-9341) [Chloroform extract,
Column fraction]; L. sporogenus [Chloroform extract] and Citrobacter
[Chloroform extract, Column fraction] were inhibited at 5mg/ml level. B. subtils (PI-6633) [Pet. ether extract]
inhibited at 3.33mg/ml level. B.
cereus (PI-11778) [Column
fraction] and Providencia
[Chloroform extract, Column fraction]
were inhibited at 50mg/ml level.
REFERENCES:
1.
Ajitha M., Rajnarayana K., Role of oxygen free radicals in human
diseases. Indian drugs 2001. 38: 545–554.
2.
Nita T, Arai T, Takamatsu H et al. Antibacterial activity
of extracts prepared from tropical and subtropical plants on methicillin resistant Staphylococcus
aureus. J Health Sci
48: 273-6, 2002.
3.
Velickovic DT, Randjelovi NV, RisticM et al.
Chemical constituents and antimicrobial activity of the ethanol extracts
obtained from the flower, leaf and stem of Salvia
officinalis L. J Serb Chem. Soc 68: 17-24,
2003.
4.
Cowans M.M., Plant
products as antimicrobial agents. Clinic Microbiol.
Rev 12: 564-82, 1999.
5.
Sakagami Y, Murata H,
Nakanishi T et al. Inhibitory Effect of Plant Extracts on Production of Verotoxin by Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 157: H7. J Health Sci 47: 473-477,
2001.
6.
Ates DA, ErdoÛrul .T. Antimicrobial activities of various medicinal
and commercial plant extracts. Turk J Biol 27: 157-62, 2003.
Received on 02.05.2012 Accepted on 28.06.2012
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Res. 2(3): July-Sept. 2012;
Page 107-110